🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim endured a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over System & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for using excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later discard them for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.